Home Dash Dash Considers 51% Attack Insufficient

Dash Considers 51% Attack Insufficient

Due to its groundbreaking feature dubbed ChainLocks, Dash lately claimed that it had been the globe's safest cryptocurrency for a year, making a 51% attack nearly unfeasible.

Dash and Zcash Privacy Coins iBase Trading.
iBase Trading Crypto News

Due to its groundbreaking feature dubbed ChainLocks, Dash lately claimed that it had been the globe’s safest cryptocurrency for a year, making a 51% attack nearly unfeasible.

As per the Dash Core group, neither protocol has yet been able to equal ChainLocks, which was implemented in early July 2019. Andreas Antonopoulos is one of the famous and well-known Bitcoin educators. She has proposed that a 10-minute 51% strike on the Bitcoin blockchain would cost roughly $1 billion, which seems implausible.


51% Attack

When a group of hostile miners has greater hashing power than that of the aggregate hashing power of all the other miners on the network, a 51% mining attack is feasible. In the end, it accumulates enough power to steal coins, cancel transactions, and disrupt the network’s operation.

If the usual assumptions behind the proof-of-work consensus method are correct, then 51 percent of mining assaults are not a concern for blockchains like Bitcoin. This is according to the Cornell University specialists. It is preferable to be truthful rather than to engage in malevolent actions.

An additional assumption is that reasonable people provide the majority of the hashing power. There are times, however, when such beliefs are incorrect. The allocation of hashing power may vary.

For example, the creation of new ASIC mining equipment was kept secret, or members of mining pools plotted to make more money, making the attack more profitable for the victims or at least reducing the losses to a manageable level.

Large networks, like the Bitcoin platform, are less vulnerable to a 51% attack. This is because the cost of obtaining more than half of the computational power exceeds the possible benefit. Minor projects, including Ethereum Classic or Bitcoin Cash, may be more vulnerable.

Regardless of the fact that Bitcoin Cash employs the same SHA256D algorithm as Bitcoin, its hashing power is less than 5% that of Bitcoin. As evidenced by the 2019 hash battles in the Bitcoin Cash community, this causes uncertainty in the PoW algorithm.

Bitcoin Has an Attack Cost

In the same way that larger networks are less vulnerable to cyber-attacks, Bitcoin has an attack cost, but it is so high that manipulating it is uneconomical.

The cost of a comprehensive 51 percent attack on the Bitcoin network in January would have been well over $21 million per day, according to Messari’s estimates. A one-hour attack now costs $468,995 per hour, or $11.3 million per day, according to publishing information.

Regardless of whether an attacker has the appropriate sum of money, attacking the Bitcoin network is difficult. First and foremost, an attacker will have to buy or acquire a massive amount of mining apparatus. Purchasing new equipment is difficult due to the fact that firms’ capacity and equipment schedule months.

Therefore, in order to overtake the Chinese producers, an attacker would have to start secretly ramping up its own production. The biggest ASIC miner companies are unlikely to launch such an attack. It is because it would utterly disrupt their business strategy of selling mining equipment.

Given that the purpose of the Bitcoin network is to be decentralized with a modest proportion of every individual miner. Combining talents would be incredibly challenging, requiring significant effort and monetary investment.

“The views and opinions on this Crypto News Website are solely those of the authors and contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of iBaseTrading or its partners.”

Previous articleElrond to Hackers: Test the Blockchain Network
Next articleArweave Solana Accessibility Hack
Peter Gonzalez is an experienced writer focusing on cryptocurrencies and other financial topics with a passion for personal finance. Peter enjoys Sports cars and travelling.